|
Children of Men
In the not-too-distant-future of 2027, the human race borders
on extinction. A child hasn't been born in 18 years due to
a mysterious infertility plague that swept the globe. Great
Britain is now a police state where immigrants are locked
up and deported (or done away with), but many people manage
to continue their day-to-day lives—or commit suicide
with help from a new pharmaceutical tablet. Working stiff
Theo (Clive Owens) stays sane by visiting his pothead pal,
Jasper (Michael Caine). But he's jolted into sudden action
and out of complacency when his ex, Julian (Julianne Moore),
begs a favor: to help get a young black girl, Kee (Claire-Hope
Ashitey), out of the country to the safety of a possibly
fictitious, utopian-minded think tank dubbed The Human Project.
Why Kee? Because she's pregnant, and with her unborn child
she carries the possible future of humanity. However, Theo
finds this a difficult challenge with violence, and duplicitous
gangs determined to kill him and keep Kee for their own motives,
on every side.
Ignoring logic flaws, and an admittedly vague motivation
for the bad guys' plight to keep Kee away from The Human
Project (they don't want a utopian future?), this is a pretty
entertaining dystopian future thriller. In adapting P. D.
James' novel of the same name, director Alfonso Cuarón
(Y tu Mama Tambien) stages some dynamic—and loud—chase
scenes and visceral action with help from astounding and
seamless special effects. With its grim, grey, sickly images
of London, Danny Boyle's even grittier 28 Days Later is,
at times, called to mind. There are a few exciting twists
and turns as well, so it's best you not read too many reviews
lest someone open their gob too wide. There's a bit of dark
humor scattered about, including a series of TV ads for that
euthanasia tablet mentioned earlier, and clever bits of futuristic
detail and information.
We love Moore always, and Owens is pretty charismatic, likable
and believable as a guy forced into action (one can see how
rumors that he was considered as James Bond were started
by fans). Caine provides some lightness, while Queer as Folk's
Charlie Hunnam and Kinky Boots' Chiwetel Ejiofor bring shadowy
menace and testosterone as Kee's determined and dangerous
protectors. And 19-year-old Ashitey is both assured and,
by virtue of her character's predicament, vulnerable. Just
like humanity itself. —Lawrence Ferber
Notes on a Scandal
One of the great things about British cinema—Four Weddings
and a Funeral, Notting Hill and Love Always aside—is
its refreshing lack of sentimentality and cheap theatrics.
Instead of manipulating audiences with emotionally overwrought
music scores and contrived plot devices, British films tend
to simply present a series of events and leave the audience
to draw their own conclusions.
Richard Eyre’s Notes on a Scandal is but one example
of this sort of superior kind of filmmaking, and it’s
a damn good one at that. Casting Cate Blanchett as a married
school teacher who becomes sexually involved with a 15-year-old
student (Andrew Simpson), the film thankfully avoids moralizing
and sermonizing on the inappropriateness of such an affair
by instead focusing on a much different dramatic plot: that
of the dangerous obsession that fellow teacher Barbara (Judi
Dench) seems to have developed for Blanchett’s Sheba.
A spinsterish grouch with a checkered past, Barbara sets
her sights on the younger woman, and—after discovering
Sheba’s transgression—uses the knowledge of the
affair to her advantage, thus initiating a twisted “seduction” that
threatens to destroy both their lives.
It’s all very melodramatic in theory, but director
Eyre avoids histrionics at every turn, directing from Patrick
Marber’s (Closer) straight-forward adaptation of Zoe
Heller’s novel with terse precision. His choice to
eschew cheap stunts in favor of a more authentic approach—and
Philip Glass’ effective, suspenseful score—serve
the film’s plot twists well, though the strong performances
are the movie’s greatest assets. Playing against type,
Blanchett radiates an unhinged sensuality and reckless abandon
that gives her a chance to spread her wings, but it’s
Dench’s Oscar-worthy turn that truly impresses. Making
Barbara seem both dangerously freakish and sympathetic, she
carries this modest but enthralling suspense yarn along on
her stern shoulders in a performance that is nothing short
of mesmerizing. —Ken Knox
Pan’s Labyrinth
Since impressing many with his well received 1993 vampire
flick Cronos, Mexican director Guillermo del Toro has turned
out a series of films that has been by turns inventive
(Mimic), haunting (The Devil’s Backbone), shameless
(Blade II), and just plain silly (Hellboy). Whatever his
movies’ faults, del Toro has injected each one of
them with the same atmospheric mood and tone, weaving stories
more out of an emphasis on character than on contrived
plot twists. And in his latest, the bizarrely compelling
Pan’s Labyrinth, the director has finally begun to
live up to his potential.
Set against the post-war repression caused by the Spanish
Civil War, the movie spins the fantastical tale of a young
girl named Ofelia (Ivana Baquero), who travels with her pregnant
and ailing mother (Ariadna Gil) to their new home at the
well-guarded, dreary estate of fascist army captain Vidal
(Sergi López), who has taken Ofelia’s mother
as his bride. When a dragonfly pays a visit to Ofelia in
the middle of the night, Ofelia follows it into the woods,
where she is led into a mysterious labyrinth. There, she
meets a shifty, inscrutable Faun (Doug Jones), who tells
Ofelia that she is a princess that must complete three tasks
before she is granted immortality. From then on, the labyrinth
and its cast of magical, sometimes dangerous creatures becomes
her (real? imagined?) escape from her increasingly dreary
life.
Inventive and beautifully shot, Pan’s Labyrinth is
not your usual fairy tale. Indeed, considering the amount
of graphic violence and gore, parents would be ill advised
to let their kids watch this one. However, adults who grew
up on the Brothers Grimm will love its detours into the fantastical,
which are expertly woven into the film’s “real” plot.
While Javier Navarrete’s simple but haunting score
and Guillermo Navarro’s lush cinematography complement
the depressed overtones—and young Baquero’s splendid
performance provides a much-needed dose of innocence to temper
the darker moments—it is del Toro’s unique and
imaginative vision of a world where anything is possible
that is the true star of this brilliant cinematic treasure. —K.K.
Perfume: The Story of a Murderer
Based on the cult novel Das Parfum, Tom Tykwer’s Perfume:
The Story of a Murderer is bizarre and compelling, lush and
disturbing, a sensuous myth on the power of scent and the
human desire to confine its essence.
Without indulging too much plot, the story trails Jean-Baptiste
Grenouille (Ben Whishaw), an orphaned boy born with prodigious
olfactory senses in the Paris fish markets of the 1800s.
Perfume is the picaresque journey of Grenouille’s obsession
to distill a legendary scent—one with the power to
transform mankind. His ultimate aroma requires the refinement
of young female flesh; he has a murderous taste for France’s
ginger-haired maidens.
For its first hour, the film is a Dickensian romp. Tykwer
creates a palpable squalor in the fish markets and tanning
factories where Grenouille works prior to becoming the apprentice
to Baldini (Dustin Hoffman), a master perfumer past his prime.
Grenouille implores Baldini to teach him how to “capture” scent,
not just create it. Tykwer actually visualizes aroma when
Baldini, after banishing his young protégé,
removes the stopper from a perfume bottle to intake Grenouille’s
first confection. The camera circles Hoffman in a grungy
lab and, while turning, replaces the drab surroundings with
a garden of aromas—jasmine, sage, lavender—and
the soft kiss of a red-haired woman, returning full stop
to the perfumer in his lair, a changed man. Hoffman’s
nose has waited all its life for this role.
Perfume darkens as it lengthens, and grows harrowing. Though
it doesn’t take root as most myths do —there
doesn’t seem to be any real-life antecedent to latch
onto—it’s still haunting. The film’s too
long— the hunt for Grenouille in the second half goes
on—yet Tykwer’s imagination never lags. Grenouille’s
tragedy is that scent vanishes—the essence captured
can only be fleeting. What Tykwer catches with Perfume may
linger forever in the cinematic memory. —Dan Loughry
|