|
By Karen Ocamb
The long sharp knives of negative campaigning have begun
sticking it to several candidates in the March 6 West Hollywood
election. Unfortunately, the format of the televised West
Hollywood Chamber of Commerce debate Feb. 22 was not conducive
to an exchange of charges and responses now exploding in
campaign mailers.
The bulk of the debate, which will be re-run several times
on West Hollywood City Channel, focused on affordable housing
and new development in the city, giving all 10 candidates
a chance to briefly explain their views.
The real campaign duel, however, is between the incumbents
who have been endorsed by the West Hollywood Democratic Club
and Stonewall Democratic Club, Mayor John Heilman, Mayor
Pro Tem Sal Guarriello, and Councilmember Abbe Land, and
the "Save West Hollywood" slate of attorney Steve
Martin, retired businessman Ed Buck and Heavenly Wilson.
During the debate, Martin alleged that the incumbents have
taken campaign contributions from developers who are planning
five and 10-story buildings. Land acknowledged that she accepted
contributions from developers, among scores of others, so
she can get her message out. But she told IN, "I don't
take campaign contributions to influence my vote. Not at
all."
Land reminded the audience that all development projects
are subject to a public process and while the Council is
considering mix-use projects that may produce larger buildings,
no such projects have come before them.
Heilman noted that when Martin was on the Council, he pushed
for Sunset Millennium project, which Martin now concedes
may be too big. "I'm glad to hear him admit that he
was wrong when he voted for it," Heilman said. "It
was a major project, and he was the one who really supported
it." Martin said he had learned from his mistakes.
Asked how he reconciled his rhetoric on campaign contributions
with his record of having violated state campaign finance
laws, Martin explained that he made a "mistake" and
charged Land with a similar impropriety.
"I think I made one mistake transferring some money
from an Assembly account that I had briefly into a Council
account," Martin said. "When I found out that was
a violation, I simply gave the money to charity. I think
Abbe Land also had a surplus when she ran for her Assembly
race, and she gave that money to a committee called Committee
for Good Government or Responsible Government, which just
recently she gave $2,500 to that independent expenditure
campaign which recently put out a report card giving her
an 'A+.' She hasn't been cited yet, but I'm sure she will
be because, frankly, that's transferring Assembly money for
her City Council race, even though it's an 'independent expenditure.'
Also, one of the other councilmembers was recently admonished
by the district attorney of Los Angeles for doing fundraising
for Abbe Land's Assembly race out of City Hall and putting
an RSVP to his Council deputy. I think people have to be
a bit careful here, before they start tossing around these
kinds of things."
The campaign finance question referred to a violation by
Martin of the Political Reform Act, according to a Jan. 4,
2005, letter from the Fair Political Practices Commission
(FPPC). While a councilmember, Martin formed an exploratory
committee to run for the Assembly in the March 7, 2000, primary.
He raised about $39,000. But he withdrew from the race in
November 1999, the FPPC letter says, turning Martin's campaign
money into surplus funds on Dec. 31, 1999, subject to the
legal restrictions of Government Code section 89519.
"From January 2000 through July 2000, Mr. Martin impermissibly
used the surplus campaign funds to make contributions to
other candidates, totaling $2,600. In addition, Mr. Martin
transferred surplus campaign funds totaling $28,000 to his
city council committee in violation of the local $1,000 contribution
limit," the FPPC letter reads.
In October 2002, City Attorney Mike Jenkins told Martin he
would have to "dispose" of the money. Martin "impermissibly" gave
a $1,000 contribution to a candidate and gave the rest to
a number of charities.
The FPPC closed the matter without instituting a formal enforcement,
the letter says, because it was Martin's first offense, he
was no longer an elected official, he "attempted to
remediate the violation," and the violation "is
not relatively significant." However, the letter reads, "Mr.
Martin has been advised that his conduct violated state campaign
laws," and the violation could be used against him in
the future.
Land told IN that the law allows a brief window immediately
after the election during which the candidate can contribute
to other candidates, political action committees (PACs),
or organizations. She said she dispersed money from her Assembly
account in June, "before I knew who was running" in
the City Council race. Some of the contributions went to
elected officials such as state Sen. Sheila James Kuehl and
Sec. of State Debra Bowen, as well as the Coalition for Responsible
Leadership, the PAC to which Martin referred during the debate.
The CRL helped her in the past, and they also contributed
to organizations Land supports. When she found out CRL was
the group responsible for the Renter's Report Card campaign
mailer, she asked to be re-funded her $2,000 contribution. "That's
not how I intended to have that money used," Land told
IN.
Martin's allegation about another councilmember who was "recently
admonished" by the D.A.'s office, actually refers to
Councilmember Jeff Prang, who is not up for re-election.
D.A. spokesperson Jane Robison told IN that there has been
no recent investigation of any complaint involving West Hollywood
since January 2007. Martin and Buck told IN, however, that
the D.A. did take action against Prang last year and they
had the letter to Prang on D.A. letterhead to prove it.
The letter to Prang, which Buck provided to IN, is dated
May 11, 2006, from the Public Integrity Division explaining
that the office had received a complaint that Prang was "using
City of West Hollywood resources for political purposes in
violation of California law. Specifically, it is alleged
that on May 2, 2006, you sent an e-mail through a Yahoo!
group account (Councilmember Prang News@yahoogroups.com)
endorsing assembly candidate Abbe Land and soliciting political
contributions. It is alleged that the Yahoo! group account
is maintained by the City of West Hollywood."
Prang told IN the Yahoo! group account was not maintained
by the city, was not sent from City Hall, and was in fact
his personal e-mail listserv through which he sent his regular
newsletter. The problem, as the D.A.'s letter noted, was
that the newsletter contained a link to another Yahoo! homepage
which had a greeting from Prang as a City Councilmember and
told anyone with questions about city business to contact
his deputy, Josh Kurpies. "It was not an RSVP," Prang
told IN.
The link "raises concerns," the letter said. "For
example, it would be improper for someone responding to your
email to link to the homepage and request additional candidate
or fundraising information from you or Josh Kurpies by way
of your city e-mail addresses or city telephones."
However, the D.A.'s office concluded, "since this appears
to be an isolated incident" and they determined it did
not meet the threshold for a criminal investigation, "this
matter is officially closed."
Prang told IN that, in order to avoid any further confusion
or even the appearance of a conflict of interest, he stopped
using Yahoo! groups and purchased the services of a private
e-mail distributor for his newsletter.
Buck and Martin told IN that by reviewing the controversial
e-mail and issuing the letter, the D.A.'s office took "action" against
the alleged "illegal fundraising activities ... conducted
from offices at City Hall." They also maintained that
even though Prang was not running for re-election, the incident
was indicative of the "culture of corruption" in
City Hall and therefore a legitimate charge in the current
election.
Prang balked. "It's all about spin," he told IN, "taking
things that are innocuous and making them sound terrible.
It's very Karl Rovian," referring to President Bush's
political director.
For information about the election, visit www.weho.org.
|